Three lines long, no reason given. An orthopaedic hospital in Abu Dhabi, 2023, and the account was finished before I understood it had been in any trouble.

We had the whole account. Their social media, their Meta and Google advertising, their search, and the results were good.

I drove to Abu Dhabi every month for the video shoot. The quarterly review happened once, and I presented the numbers to their MD myself.

He asked what more we could do to grow faster.

I knew about one problem. Before us, their Arabic had been written in-house, by someone on their customer support team.

Our Arabic was correct. The note that kept coming back was that we were missing the dialect. They sent it back, we rewrote it, they sent it back again.

Dialect is hard to argue line by line, so nobody argued it. What settled instead was a view: the agency cannot write the language their patients actually read.

So I fixed it. I changed the copywriter, then changed the replacement.

None of it had happened anywhere they could see.

Fixing the Arabic quietly was the mistake. By the time the copy was coming back with almost no changes, they had already made up their minds about us.

Nobody there ever confirmed that for me. I filed it under bad luck before I filed it correctly.

I had treated their frustration as a production problem. It was a relationship problem wearing production clothes.

A client who has decided you are not good at something stops noticing when you get good at it. By then the decision is made.

The quiet fixing was only half of it. The other half took longer to see, because I was there in person every month.

A quarterly review is where the good numbers go. The frustration was living somewhere else entirely, in the weekly back and forth over copy, and I was nowhere near those conversations.

I had seen that gap, and I had already put someone into it. I hired an account director, so that somebody senior was holding the relationship every week instead of once a quarter.

The account director had joined a few weeks earlier, with no history with this client and none of the standing that comes from having solved something with them before.

Every time I asked how the hospital was, the answer came back calm and reassuring. Nobody ever picked up the phone to the client and said the hard part out loud.

I took the reassurance as evidence, and I never checked it myself.

Their side had no senior client lead. My contact there was junior and new, holding a budget considerably bigger than her authority.

She was not the problem. Nobody had given her the standing to tell her own management that the agency was wearing them down, and no one on my side ever asked her how bad it had got.

So the relationship ran between two people who had both just arrived. Both sides had a reason, and neither reason kept the account.

When the account ended the revenue stopped that month. The salaries did not.

Ten people stayed on the payroll while I went looking for another account to replace the revenue, and the pitching that followed cost money the hospital was no longer bringing in. Lighter weeks for the team, same salary at the end of each one.

Owning an agency is different from working in one. You go back over every loss looking for the part you caused.

Not every lost client is a client you could have kept.

A clinic in Dubai went under while we were still working for them. Three years together, and then the market turned competitive, their margins disappeared, and they carried on buying marketing to squeeze the last revenue out of a business they already knew was closing.

They were in liquidation for the last four months, and we found out when they stopped existing.

Nothing I could have done differently would have changed that ending. I have gone back over it and the answer does not move.

Some clients leave because of something you did. Some leave because their own business was already ending. Blaming yourself for something you could not have prevented will make you second-guess everything, and calling your own mistake bad luck will make you careless.

You usually cannot tell the two apart until long after the invoicing has stopped. The hospital was my own mistake, which is why it is worth writing about.

In the end the work was fixed and it changed nothing. I was visible on that account without ever being close to it, and the person I put there was close to it without being trusted yet.

Fixing it in your own building is not the same as handling it.

So I changed how I ran every account after that one.

Tell them what you have seen and what you did about it, and tell them especially when the problem is already fixed. Waiting until you have good news feels like good manners, and in the meantime the client makes up their mind.

Take responsibility for the gap where their own senior person should be, even though no contract mentions it. When your contact cannot carry the relationship, carrying it is the work.

Put a new person in beside the client rather than in front of them, and stay there yourself until the client trusts that person the way they trusted you.

And let the client own the wins in front of their own people.

None of it is strategy. One rule, showing up at four different moments.

I made all of it non-negotiable, because I had learned what the alternative costs, and the whole cost lands in a single month.

I am reasonably sure I know why they left, and I was never owed the explanation.

What I got instead was six months, a monthly fee I still remember, and one rule I have not broken since: a problem is not handled until the client has watched me handle it.

Eighty per cent of my clients renewed, year after year. I did not learn any of this from them.

Until the next one,
Karim

Read this issue on karimmneimneh.com

Anyone who has run accounts for long enough keeps a private list of the things they were right about. The risk you flagged in March that landed in July. The channel you argued against that underdelivered exactly as you said it would.

That list is the nearest thing you have to proof that your judgement is worth paying for.

For eight years I ran my own agency in Dubai, and I kept mine like everyone else.

I have read almost none of it out loud.

Keeping that list private has a cost of its own, and it is the part nobody says. A warning you never claim is a warning nobody records.

The client forgets the warning was ever yours. Your own team watched you let it go. The person setting your fee next year has never seen the judgements you got right, because you kept every one of them to yourself.

Anyone who sells you silence as maturity has not counted that cost.

The reason not to claim the credit anyway is about who is actually sitting in front of you.

When the thing you warned about arrives, you are thinking about your judgement. The client is thinking about the decision they now have to explain, to people whose opinion of them matters far more than yours does.

And that decision carries their name whether or not it was their idea.

The I-told-you-so is aimed at the decision. It lands on the person carrying the decision, and that person is usually the one who chose you, defends your budget internally and signs next year's renewal.

You win the argument, and it comes out of your own fee.

Being right is worth saying out loud in the right room. The meeting where your warning has just come true is not that room.

I have been in that meeting more times than I can count. The earliest I can still place was in Beirut, long before Dubai, when I was an account manager on an FMCG account.

We had put a route in front of the client that we believed in, and their marketing team believed in it too. Their own management did not, and sent back a different idea instead.

I said what I thought once, and then we made the thing they had asked for.

The campaign underperformed. Not badly enough to be a crisis, and clearly enough to show in the numbers.

We went through those numbers in a meeting room, across the table from the marketing team. The marketing team had agreed with us.

They had lost the same argument we had lost, one level above them, and they were the ones sitting there carrying the result.

Our recommendation was a few slides back in a deck everyone in that room had already seen. Saying so would have taken one sentence, and my account executive was beside me.

That one sentence would have proved us right to the only people at the client who already knew we were right.

What I said instead was closer to: here is where we are, and here is what I would do about it now. Then we did that.

I could not tell you now how that account ended. I can tell you exactly what I did not say.

The list does not get thrown away. Being right is worth something, and pretending otherwise fools nobody.

What changes is the room you open the list in.

A meeting about what went wrong is looking backwards. Almost any version of you being right in that room makes somebody smaller. Usually, it is the person left carrying the decision, not the one who made it.

The scope conversation belongs to a different room. So do the fee, the renewal and the plan for the year ahead.

In that room being right becomes evidence for what to do next, and the client can use that evidence without losing anything in front of anybody. The room is what decides whether being right helps you or costs you.

The third room is not a client meeting at all. It is the one most agency leaders forget.

A junior who only ever watches you say nothing learns that being right does not matter. They should see the list, and they should hear why you kept it shut in front of the client.

The client never needs to watch you win. Your own people need to understand what you chose not to say, and what you were protecting.

Silence can go too far. If the same warning keeps getting ignored, saying nothing has stopped being patience and turned into a habit of not being heard.

That deserves its own conversation, named once as a question about how decisions get made, and never as a tally of who was right.

You will be right about something this quarter. There will be a meeting where saying so feels like the most natural thing in the world.

Look at who is actually sitting across from you first. In that room in Beirut, they were the only people at the client who had ever agreed with us.

Drop the credit in the room that looks backwards. Keep the list for the room that decides what comes next.

Until the next one,
Karim

Read this issue on karimmneimneh.com

A healthcare client, AED 30,000 a month, a year into the relationship. The team was strong, the client was happy, and for most of the call I had nothing to add.

So I stopped going. I stopped reading the room.

I handed it to an Account Manager who ran the day to day better than I did, and I told myself it was a promotion for her and a saving for the agency.

About six months later, the account did not renew.

Nothing had gone wrong with the work.

There is a version of that moment on every account. The people who won the work step back and someone else carries the relationship. It can happen the week the contract is signed, or a year in, when the account looks settled enough to leave alone.

It has a name most agencies never say out loud. It is the handoff.

The handoff is also where most senior people quietly step away. The handoff feels like the natural end of their job. The work is won, the relationship is warm, and someone else can run it from here.

That reading treats the account as a job now finished.

It is closer to a test. The handoff is the first time anyone finds out whether the relationship holds without the person who built it.

What had gone from that account was the client's sense of the person who won their trust. A capable team they felt no attachment to turned out to be easy to replace.

None of that was the Account Manager's doing. She ran it well. What she could not do was be the person the client had signed with, and a client who feels nothing in particular about their agency will always find a reason to test the market.

I ran my own agency for eight years, and I stayed close to my accounts. Close through the win, close through the launch, close through the slow months when nothing was on fire. They renewed, most of them, year after year, and for a long time I put that down to the work.

That healthcare account was the one I stepped back from, and it taught me what I had been getting right without knowing it.

A renewal turns on a relationship the client can feel. The handoff is the point where that feeling either crosses to the new team or drains out of the account, and being in the room is what decides which.

On the accounts I kept, it was never about doing the team's job for them. What held them was a familiar face in the room when the work changed hands, a question asked before the client thought to ask it, a sense that the person who made the promise was still the person answering for it.

Presence has a cost of its own, and it is not small.

Sit in every meeting, keep your senior hours on an account that is already running well, and you protect the renewal by bleeding the margin. Senior time costs several times what junior time costs.

The discipline is to stay close through the first few meetings of the new phase, long enough for the trust to cross over, then step back. Present enough to hold the connection and keep the work on plan. No more than that.

When an account leaves, the work was usually fine. What changed is that the person who won it was no longer in the room.

Senior hours are expensive everywhere except across a handoff. A renewal is where the profit on an account is actually decided.

On that account the arithmetic was plain. AED 30,000 a month is AED 360,000 a year, and it turned on the quarterly reviews I decided I did not need to be in.

Winning a client is expensive, and the first year often pays that cost back slowly. The profit lives in the years after, and each of those years turns on a renewal.

The quarterly review is also where you hear what is coming next for the client, and where you shape the work around it before anyone else does.

Skipping it to save a few senior hours is the falsest economy in the business.

Those hours get cut because a renewal you protected leaves no evidence behind. The account carries on, the invoice repeats, and nothing in the numbers says it was ever at risk.

Presence does not guarantee that an account renews. Absence does nothing to protect it, and that gap is the whole case for staying.

I never found out which review it was. Somewhere in those six months, on a video call I was not on, the account stopped being mine to the client. It had not yet become the Account Manager’s, and the work carried on without anyone noticing.

Nobody renews a supplier they have stopped recognising.

Until the next one,
Karim

Read this issue on karimmneimneh.com

Every agency lead answers that question a few times a week. Usually in a second, usually correctly, and almost always by looking at the contract.

In 2024 I had been running social media for a fertility client for two years. Everything we were paid to do was written down, and everything written down was getting done.

The scope of work is a useful document. It names what was agreed, what gets delivered, and what gets paid for.

Behind that same document is the easiest place in the world to hide.

When something falls just outside it, the safest sentence a supplier can say is that it is not in the brief. Nobody could argue. The line is right there on the page.

The other answer is to take responsibility for what matters even when the contract does not name it, on the days the safe reply is that it is not your job.

Done without judgement, it is a recipe for free work. Owning everything that drifts near you is how you end up doing three jobs for the price of one, bleeding the margin on the account while the client quietly learns to expect it.

The version that keeps a client is narrower and harder than owning everything in reach. Own the right bit.

That year the client invited me to a strategy day at their offices. Every head of department was in the room, and the chairman with them. I was there as the supplier who ran their social media, the kind of presence that takes notes and stays useful.

The safe move was obvious. Take notes, stay quiet, speak when spoken to, and remember whose room it was.

I did the opposite.

I spoke as though I were part of the team, because the room was deciding whether to build the doctors' names or the clinic's, and I had a view worth putting on the table, and holding it back to protect my place would have served no one. By the end of the hour the chairman was asking me about marketing decisions that had nothing to do with what we had been hired to deliver.

Two years of their social pointed at the doctors. I argued for the clinic anyway, because a doctor you build is a doctor who can leave and take the patients with them.

None of that was in my scope. That was the point.

The contract covered the work. The moment covered the relationship, and the relationship is where the next year of work is won or lost.

That hour could easily have gone the other way.

Speak up in a room that is not yours and you risk seeming to overstep, or angling for more work, or stepping on the person whose job it actually was. Those risks are real, and they are why most suppliers choose the quiet corner.

I took the risk on one judgement: what I had to say mattered more than the appearance of knowing my place.

The test is not whether something sits inside the brief. It is whether it changes the outcome the brief was bought for.

Most of what drifts past the scope line fails that test and should be handed back with a name attached.

Anyone can do more than the brief. Knowing which part of it decides whether they keep you is the whole job.

Telling the two apart takes one question. Ask what the client is being measured on this year, and whether the thing in front of you moves that number or simply sits near it.

Work that sits near that number still lands on your desk. Someone is short of a pair of hands, or a decision has no owner, and it drifts towards the supplier who says yes.

The part worth owning is the part where a decision is about to be made badly and you are the only person in the room who can see it.

Own that part and you get pulled towards the decisions, because the people making them can feel that you are carrying the result with them rather than waiting to be told what to build.

That is also where the next brief comes from. What that client asked us for after the strategy day was not more social media. It was consultancy.

Work that comes from a client already on the books costs almost nothing to win, and it starts with the problem you took on because it mattered rather than because it was yours.

What you take on once, you have taken on. Six months later the client does not remember it as a favour. They remember it as the way the account works.

So the discipline is not to stop. Name the thing the second time it appears and put a price on it, because a judgement you offered once is now work you deliver.

The next time something lands near you that nobody wrote into the contract, the right move is usually to hand it back. Once or twice a year it is not.

The bit that was never in your scope is usually the one they remember you for.

Until the next one,
Karim

Read this issue on karimmneimneh.com

It was an outdoor campaign for an FMCG brand, the sites were already booked, and the client did not know yet.

That was early in my career. What I remember is not the slip, it is the hour I sat at my desk deciding whether to say anything.

There is a silence that kills more client relationships than bad work ever does.

Everyone can feel that something needs to be said. The scope is starting to drift past what was agreed, or the relationship has cooled and no one has said so.

Whatever it is, everyone feels it early, and everyone waits for someone else to name it first.

Raise the hard thing yourself, while it is still small enough to do something about, instead of waiting for the client to raise it once it has become a problem.

The difficulty is not that people miss the problem. Everyone can usually see it coming.

What stops them is that having the call means putting your judgement on the table before you can be sure you are right. Sometimes the problem has already happened and the client does not know yet. Sometimes you are reading early, on where things are heading.

You might be wrong, and the client is there to see it.

It also means saying the thing they will not enjoy hearing, with no way of knowing how they will take it.

Silence feels safe. The call feels like a risk you are choosing to take, on a day when nobody is forcing you to take it.

Every call before the outdoor campaign had been a yes, the easy kind we had all grown used to. That call was the first time I had to pick up the phone and say the hard thing.

My hands were sweating and my heart was racing.

I did more than deliver the bad news. I named the slip and brought the plan to protect what mattered most, in the same call, before they had to chase me for it.

They stayed. On the projects that followed they came to me earlier and with more, because I had been the one to name the problem and the one who worked out how to fix it.

I have made that call many times since. The price that needed to change, the trouble on the horizon nobody wanted to name, the direction we had all agreed on that had quietly stopped being right.

I never enjoyed the hour before any of them.

The moment arrives just before you start, while the words are still yours to swallow. I learned to pick up the phone in that moment, rather than after it.

The fear is familiar. That the client will hear the problem as your failure, or decide you are difficult, or begin to wonder what else you have been holding back.

None of those fears is irrational. They are simply not what usually happens.

Clients can tell the difference between someone protecting the relationship and someone protecting themselves.

They tell by the timing. A problem you raise while there is still something to do about it is a problem you are carrying with them. The same problem raised once it has cost them something is a problem you were hiding.

The vendor waits to be told there is a problem. The advisor is the one who says it first.

Something shifts once you have done this a few times with the same client.

They learn that you will tell them the uncomfortable thing while it is still useful to hear. So they start bringing you their own hard questions sooner, while there is still time to answer them.

The call you were afraid to make becomes the reason they trust you with the next one.

That trust does not come from the call alone. It comes from what you bring to it.

You do not walk in, put the problem on the table, and leave it sitting there. You bring the hard thing and the first version of what to do about it, together.

The work is not landing, and here is what I would change first. The timeline is at risk, and here is what I would protect.

Two people can raise the same problem. Only one of them arrives with the beginning of an answer.

Some of these calls went badly, and I knew before I had put the phone down.

A client decided to go a different way. A room stayed cool for weeks after I raised the thing nobody wanted raised.

You pay that cost yourself.

A client who walks after an honest call was usually already walking. What the call changes is when you find out, and how much of the year you still have to do something about it.

The early call is the intentional one, made while you still have options. Waiting turns it into a reaction, forced late and on worse terms.

A concern raised in time costs an awkward week. The same concern left to surface on its own costs the account. One is a bad week in the calendar, the other is a hole in the year's margin.

The client is already having this conversation, in their own head, with you or without you. The only thing you decide is whether you are in the room for it.

Until the next one,
Karim

Read this issue on karimmneimneh.com

The work was good. The team turned up. The client said the right things in the reviews. Then the email came, warm and final, and the account moved on.

So the agency holds a post-mortem.

Someone blames the price. Someone blames a competitor who came in cheaper. Someone remembers a deadline that slipped back in March.

Everyone leaves the room with a reason they can fix, and not one of them is the real reason.

The real reason rarely comes up there. The agency is asking what went wrong with the work.

The client did not leave over the work.

Keeping a client gets treated as a performance problem. So when an account feels shaky, agencies respond the way they know how.

They add more people to it. They work later and sharpen the next deck. They quietly discount to show goodwill.

The work is the floor. It is what buys you the seat at the table.

Clients leave because you stopped being relevant to them.

Relevant in the plainest sense. Necessary to the decisions they are actually losing sleep over.

When you won the account, you were close to those decisions. You understood the business, the pressure on the person who hired you, the thing they were trying to prove inside their own company.

You were in the room while the problem was still being shaped.

Then the work started. And slowly, without anyone deciding it, you moved from the room to the task list.

You waited to be briefed. You delivered what was asked. You delivered it well.

And the closer you stayed to exactly what was asked, the further you drifted from the reason they hired you.

This is the drift from advisor to vendor, and almost every agency relationship makes it.

The advisor is there while the problem is still being shaped. The vendor receives the brief once the thinking is finished.

The advisor is asked what they would do. The vendor is asked what it will cost and when it will land.

One is part of the decision. The other is told the decision.

None of this makes the work matter less. The delivery still has to be excellent, every time. Being the advisor is the layer you add on top of that, not a replacement for it.

The hard part is that the drift never feels like a problem while it is happening.

Delivering exactly what was asked feels like good service. Staying in your lane feels like discipline. Waiting to be briefed feels respectful.

Every one of those instincts is right, and every one of them moves you towards becoming a vendor. That is why so many good agencies lose good clients and call it bad luck.

A client lost this way takes years of profit with them. The account that stays pays out quarter after quarter, on work you paid to win once.

Replacing that client costs far more: weeks of the team's time on the pitch, a discount to get through the door, and long months before a fresh account turns a margin.

In eight years running my own agency, after starting out at BBDO and JWT, the accounts I kept were not always the ones with the best work. They were the ones where I stayed necessary after the work was won. The longest of them ran five of those eight years.

Across more than twenty years, the same four moves keep showing up: the moves that hold a relationship in place when the drift is pulling it apart.

I think of them as HOLD.

Four moves, not a formula. Four things the advisor does that the vendor does not.

H: Have the call before they ask. Raise the hard thing first. The price rise, the timeline that is about to slip, the work that is not landing. You bring it to the table before the client has to.

O: Own beyond scope. The contract is the floor of the relationship, not the ceiling. When something matters and it is technically not your brief, you take it anyway.

L: Lead through the handoff. The transitions are where vendors disappear. The win into the delivery. The launch into the months after. The first 90 days. You stay visible exactly where most people step back.

D: Drop the credit. When you raised the concern early, were overruled, and turned out right, you skip the I-told-you-so. You protect the relationship over your own ego, and you move to what comes next.

HOLD is not a way to be liked.

Played properly, these moves sometimes cost you in the moment.

The honest pricing conversation can end with the client choosing someone cheaper. Owning the bit that was never in scope is not always noticed, or thanked.

None of these moves is scored on the day it is made.

Optimising for the client's approval in the moment is the vendor reflex. Holding the line on the right move, even when it is uncomfortable, is what the advisor does to stay in the room.

That is what this letter is for.

Every two weeks I will take one of these moves and show what it costs to make. No theory you cannot use by Monday. Just the small, hard choices that decide whether a client stays.

Because clients rarely leave on the day they tell you. They leave months earlier, quietly, every time you finish the work and sit back to wait for the next brief.

The work wins you the client.

Staying necessary is what keeps them.

Until the next one,
Karim

Read this issue on karimmneimneh.com